This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Resilience is an illusion. In saying that I mean no disrespect to resilience officers, whose work is honourable, vital and necessary. However, whether resilience has as its goal to 'bounce back' or to 'bounce forward', it represents a tendency to seek homeostasis, in other words a quest for an eventual stable equilibrium.
Building for disaster resilience requires a concerted effort to build disaster resilient buildings with new building materials and siting buildings in the right location to limit the impact of naturalhazards. The book Resilience—The Ultimate Sustainability is mentioned as a reference for you.
After much pondering of the question, I have come to the conclusion that resilience is an illusion. This is not to denigrate the work of resilience managers, as there is obviously much to be done to reduce the risk and impact of adverse events. However, the concept of resilience is, I think, suspect. References Alexander, D.E.
In reality, it is at least equally likely that the major burden the UK will have to bear will involve naturalhazards such as storms, heatwaves, wildfire or cold and snow. In the new version of the NRR naturalhazards are given shorter descriptions and less prominence than that attributed to hostile risks. (f)
There has also been a rise in geophysical events including earthquakes and tsunamis which have killed more people than any of the other naturalhazards under review in this report. Disaster risk is becoming systemic with one event overlapping and influencing another in ways that are testing our resilience to the limit,” Mizutori said.
Yet, faced with naturalhazards, relative isolation, economic deprivation and cultural decline, it badly needs social solidarity, and that is something it lacks. Several arguments can be marshalled against the idea of community resilience:- The concept of 'community' has no inherent geographical scale.
Unofficial voices have suggested that the 'cure to damage ratio' for naturalhazards is 1:43. Global probabilistic assessment of risk from naturalhazards for the Global Assessment Report 2013 (GAR13). Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities. GNCSODR 2015.
An excerpt: “Among the research topics that could support the agency’s resilience goals are work related to climate migration, risk communication and refining social vulnerability indices. These are issues that are central to the work of CU researchers in IBS and across the university, including in engineering and the physical sciences.
Towards the end of his life he became preoccupied with the threat of the Universal Deluge (in this he was not alone: see my paper on the etymology of the term 'resilience'). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey. NaturalHazards and Earth System Sciences 13(11): 2707-2716. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1986.tb00102.x
Reviewed by Donald Watson, editor of the website theOARSlist.com , Organizations Addressing Resilience and Sustainability, editor of Time-Saver Standards for Urban Design (McGraw-Hill 2001), and co-author with Michele Adams of Design for Flooding: Resilience to Climate Change (Wiley 2011).
The author posits that the attempt to reduce disaster losses by bridging the “nature/hazard versus culture/vulnerability binary” by the Western governments in the lesser developed parts of the world has only been partially effective. Series Editor: Ilan Kelman. For more information: [link].
Review by Donald Watson, co-author with Michele Adams of Design for Flooding: Resilience to Climate Change (Wiley 2011). Richard Krajeski, presented with transcribed commentary by a dozen participants of a special session held in his memory as part of the July 2020 NaturalHazard Workshop. Emerald Publishing Ltd.
The use of risk scenarios is being pushed by the PRA and the FCA at present, as part of their operational resilience agenda. This style of planning was particularly prevalent in the USA, where they have a multitude of different naturalhazards, which were addressed in business continuity plans.
Naturalhazards, public health emergencies, and other crises can strike at any moment, putting lives and livelihoods at risk. These innovations have the power to save lives, reduce economic losses, and enhance our collective resilience in the face of adversity.
The use of risk scenarios is being pushed by the PRA and the FCA at present, as part of their operational resilience agenda. This style of planning was particularly prevalent in the USA, where they have a multitude of different naturalhazards, which were addressed in business continuity plans.
Many states categorize pandemics as having a low probability of occurring when compared to other naturalhazards, but the current pandemic has shown the long term devastating social and economic consequences. In particular, COVID-19 has had disproportionate effects on low-income communities of color and front-line workers.
As severe weather continues to threaten more people and cause greater harm, building resilience against naturalhazards and climate threats is paramount: the time for governments and enterprises to act is now. Awareness programs: To build resilience to severe weather, the entire community needs to be considered.
Flooding is one of the most common, pervasive, and costliest naturalhazards in Canada , with a history of causing major disasters. and pre-stage resources such as sandbags, temporary dams and barriers, pumps, and excavation equipment can improve your community’s readiness and resilience in the event of flooding.
My first lesson is about the number of naturalhazards in the area. It is lucky that the people are resilient and ‘just get on with it’ after a disaster. Having resilient people and a ‘can do’ attitude is very much needed in an area very susceptible to natural disasters.
My first lesson is about the number of naturalhazards in the area. It is lucky that the people are resilient and ‘just get on with it’ after a disaster. Having resilient people and a ‘can do’ attitude is very much needed in an area very susceptible to natural disasters.
In 2021 a colleague who studies naturalhazards wrote to me that "our institute is all but destroyed and colleagues have lost their homes". Some 140 academic journals carry scientific and social scientific papers on hazards, risks, disasters and resilience. Powerful floods struck Puerto Lumbreras again in 2012.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content