AWS Disaster Recovery

JUNE 3, 2022

To help answer these questions, we’ll discuss the five resilience patterns in Figure 1 and the trade-offs to consider when implementing them: 1) design complexity, 2) cost to implement, 3) operational effort, 4) effort to secure, and 5) environmental impact. Effort to secure – Security complexity is less directly correlated to resilience.

Resilience 128

Resilience Architecture Disaster Recovery Banking 128

Pure Storage

JANUARY 10, 2024

Customers are able to leverage copies of a production workload for testing and development, analytics, and security to drive business change. The cloning of existing VMs requires no additional storage and only consumes capacity as new, unique data is written to the cloned data set.

Backup 52

Backup Capacity Architecture Application 52

AWS Disaster Recovery

APRIL 27, 2021

To meet these goals, we developed a long-term business continuity plan per the Disaster Recovery of Workloads on AWS: Recovery in the Cloud whitepaper that consisted of the following: We accepted data loss for the data that’s not persistent in the database. Our analysis also uncovered a gap in security monitoring. Conclusion.

Architecture 74

Architecture Resilience Backup Application 74

Pure Storage

OCTOBER 14, 2022

Gain the economics of public cloud along with the security and resilience of on premises. Subscribe to the capacity, performance, and service level you need—when you need it, and where you need it. Read the Report: As-a-service IT: Maximizing Your Return, Wherever You Are on Your Modernization Journey | ESG Whitepaper.

Architecture 52

Architecture Asset Management Application Capacity 52