This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Graff described malpractice among academic journal editors and called for a bill of rights to protect authors against such excesses. During that time I have encountered all sorts of behaviour, good and bad, by authors, reviewers and editors. Herein I am going to concentrate on malpractice by authors. Irrelevant submission.
One of these is emergencyplanning, the process of anticipating needs caused by disaster impacts and making arrangements to satisfy them as well as possible with available resources. One of the keys to this is the issue of trust in authority--or its absence. Scepticism induces me to prefer the latter.
So is the response by academic authors. In 2015 Gaillard and Gomez published an interesting paper on the "disaster research gold rush". They also wish to capture experience and preserve it as evidence on which to base future policies and plans. Authors can write in haste and repent at their leisure: editors can rue the day.
I am the founding editor of the International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (IJDRR), which began publishing in August 2012 with just four papers. Two years ago, the journal published its first issue to contain 100 papers. Academic publishing continues to mutate at a bewildering rate.
This reminded me that perhaps 70 per cent of academic publishing is for personnel reasons (to get a job, keep a job, obtain a salary raise, or achieve promotion). I cleave to the old-fashioned view that publishing should take place to further the sharing of good ideas. We confront a new phenomenon: intra-disaster research publication.
Over the last four weeks, I have been publishing a running commentary on their response here. Attacks on English local authorities, such as Hackney, I believe have not been paid, but the consequence of this is that three months later they still do not have all their systems back online. They have also said that they lost 1.2
Over the last four weeks, I have been publishing a running commentary on their response here. Attacks on English local authorities, such as Hackney, I believe have not been paid, but the consequence of this is that three months later they still do not have all their systems back online. They have also said that they lost 1.2
The role of emergencyplanning. The scenario for a major pandemic was developed over the period 2003-2009 and was first incorporated into emergencyplans close to the start of this period. Since the start of Covid-19 we have seen the failure of emergencyplanning, which is an indication of failure to provide foresight.
Boynton Priestley'" The essay recounts his mixture of pride and youthful ostentation at seeing his first, very modest effort published with all its vain attempts to appear cultured, literary and authoritative. Consider this exchange between the authors of Lord of the Flies and For Whom the Bell Tolls. "He In language, it is power!
Whilst Charlie was on holiday last week, he read a recently published book about Adaptive Business Continuity. In the newly published book ‘Adaptive Business Continuity: A New Approach’, by David Lindstedt and Mark Armour, doing away with the BIA is one of the key elements in their business continuity manifesto.
Whilst Charlie was on holiday last week, he read a recently published book about Adaptive Business Continuity. In the newly published book ‘Adaptive Business Continuity: A New Approach’, by David Lindstedt and Mark Armour, doing away with the BIA is one of the key elements in their business continuity manifesto.
The planning for large scale events and their emergencyplanning has come a long way since Hillsborough, both from a police prospective and an event planning prospective. What does that mean to us business continuity people?
The planning for large scale events and their emergencyplanning has come a long way since Hillsborough, both from a police prospective and an event planning prospective. What does that mean to us business continuity people?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content