Remove Acceptable Risk Remove Capacity Remove Continual Improvement
article thumbnail

Anti-Patterns vs. Patterns: What Is the Difference?

BMC

First, staffing ratios are almost never 1 developer to 1 QA analyst, and even a handful of developers can easily exceed the capacity of the QA team. Two patterns that are often effective at resolving this issue include: Embracing a culture of continuous improvement: “ship it when it’s better, not when it’s right.”

article thumbnail

Guide: Complete Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Reciprocity

You maintain adequate storage capacity to ensure that your data is always available. You continually improve the detection processes. You mitigate newly identified vulnerabilities or document them as accepted risks. After the audit, review the findings and implement recommended improvements.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Guide: Complete Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework

Reciprocity

You maintain adequate storage capacity to ensure that your data is always available. You continually improve the detection processes. You mitigate newly identified vulnerabilities or document them as accepted risks. After the audit, review the findings and implement recommended improvements.

article thumbnail

Anti-Patterns vs. Patterns: What Is the Difference?

BMC

First, staffing ratios are almost never 1 developer to 1 QA analyst, and even a handful of developers can easily exceed the capacity of the QA team. Two patterns that are often effective at resolving this issue include: Embracing a culture of continuous improvement: “ship it when it’s better, not when it’s right.”