This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It is obvious that military instability is likely to complicate and retard the process of getting naturalhazard impacts under control. There has recently been a surge of research interest in disaster and conflict (ref). References Fukuyama, F. The End of History and the Last Man. The Free Press, New York, 418 pp.
Previously (Alexander 2013), I thought that Holling was wrong about resilience. NaturalHazards and Earth System Sciences 13(11): 2707-2716. Some have even stated that the 2100-year-old concept of resilience was invented by Holling. On reflection, I now believe he was right and the concept itself was suspect. Holling, C.S
An example of this for the 2013 GAR can be found in Di Mauro (2014). Unofficial voices have suggested that the 'cure to damage ratio' for naturalhazards is 1:43. Global probabilistic assessment of risk from naturalhazards for the Global Assessment Report 2013 (GAR13). The 'should ratio'. GNCSODR 2015.
In disaster risk reduction circles, there is an almost desperate reliance on 'community' and a strong growth in studies and plans to "involve the community" in facing up to risks and impacts (Berkes and Ross 2013). Society and Natural Resources 26(1): 5-20. However,'community' is contentious concept (Barrios 2014). Statler and R.
It is a healthy sign in a field that draws upon more than 40 disciplines for its knowledge (Alexander 2013). NaturalHazards 86: 969-988. My only reservation about this is that we may need the impact of a recognisable paradigm in order to gain the recognition that the field needs. References Alexander, D.E. Ismail-Zadeh, A.T.,
The study of disasters is a 'lateral discipline' that, to varying degrees embraces at least 42 other disciplines and professions (Alexander 2013). For example, counter-terrorism policy and policy against naturalhazards can be quite different. This is useful to maintain and is inherent in the basis of the classification.
NaturalHazards and Earth System Sciences 13(11): 2707-2716. DOI: 10.5194/nhess-13-2707-2013 Clayton, M. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 76(1): 38-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1986.tb00102.x 1467-8306.1986.tb00102.x x Alexander, D.E. Resilience and disaster risk reduction: an etymological journey.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content