This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
I was introduced to Pure in 2012 when my team tested an early generation Pure Storage® FlashArray ™. When I was asked to evaluate new SANs for the business just months after joining, the decision to go with Pure was easy. I never need to worry about storage. Not that I’m surprised. Our holding company, All Aboard America Holdings Inc.,
To scale out we need a scaled storage layer, such as a Data Lake, to which the architecture is typically based on Hadoop, HDFS. Seldom we find the need for a relational system in a Data Lakehouse architecture - now I will caveat and say that is there is regularly need for a semantic layer, but that can take many different appearances.
From 2012 to 2019, AFAs have risen in popularity and now drive approximately 80% or more of all storage shipments for performant application environments. Architecturally, a COTS SSD needs 1GB of DRAM for every 1TB of flash capacity, primarily to drive the flash translation layer (FTL). Just what are those limitations?
3 Reasons Software Defines the Best All-Flash Array by Pure Storage Blog This article was originally published in 2012. As we have remarked before f lash memory is so radically different from hard drives that it requires wholly new software controller architecture. Flash-centric storage will be no different.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 25,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content